<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arizona businesses show courage, tell Supreme Court to strike down SB1070</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicsuncuffed.com/immigration/arizona-businesses-show-courage-tell-supreme-court-to-strike-down-sb1070/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicsuncuffed.com/immigration/arizona-businesses-show-courage-tell-supreme-court-to-strike-down-sb1070/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:51:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Erfle</title>
		<link>http://politicsuncuffed.com/immigration/arizona-businesses-show-courage-tell-supreme-court-to-strike-down-sb1070/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Erfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsuncuffed.com/?p=709#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>The lettuce farmers in Yuma use large blades in the fields. Are you comfortable letting those who are currently serving time in prison, as has been suggested by some in AZ, handle deadly weapons? By the way, they tried letting ex-cons work the fields in Georgia, and it was a disaster. The ex-cons did a fraction of the work and most left after a day or two. 

You talk about work visas, but do you understand how difficult, and in most cases, impossible it is for people to get work visas? The visa system is incredibly difficult to navigate, for both worker and employer, and our government has done little to fix it. 

What does SB1070 solve? Does it help get farmers the workers they need? No. Does it do anything to fix the problems with the drug cartels? No. Does it address those families with mixed status? No. Does it help our economy? No. 

If you would like to read about the facts behind immigration, I encourage you to check out azeir.org&#039;s website. There are ways to fix the immigration problem, but only if we start with the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lettuce farmers in Yuma use large blades in the fields. Are you comfortable letting those who are currently serving time in prison, as has been suggested by some in AZ, handle deadly weapons? By the way, they tried letting ex-cons work the fields in Georgia, and it was a disaster. The ex-cons did a fraction of the work and most left after a day or two. </p>
<p>You talk about work visas, but do you understand how difficult, and in most cases, impossible it is for people to get work visas? The visa system is incredibly difficult to navigate, for both worker and employer, and our government has done little to fix it. </p>
<p>What does SB1070 solve? Does it help get farmers the workers they need? No. Does it do anything to fix the problems with the drug cartels? No. Does it address those families with mixed status? No. Does it help our economy? No. </p>
<p>If you would like to read about the facts behind immigration, I encourage you to check out azeir.org&#8217;s website. There are ways to fix the immigration problem, but only if we start with the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me you and a dog named Boo</title>
		<link>http://politicsuncuffed.com/immigration/arizona-businesses-show-courage-tell-supreme-court-to-strike-down-sb1070/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>me you and a dog named Boo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsuncuffed.com/?p=709#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>So a total of 350 businesses (the # mentioned in the brief) which totals a whopping 6% of all of the businesses (522,926) in AZ are speaking for all businesses in AZ? The AZHCC only represents a total of 116 businesses (most of which aren&#039;t Hispanic owned), which brings the total to 466. Even if one includes the number of ALL Hispanic owned businesses @ approx. 52,000, that still doesn&#039;t reach 15% of all businesses in AZ.  How can that possibly be a true representation of the businesses&#039; position on SB1070, especially since there are plenty of naturalized immigrants who are business owners that DO support SB1070? 

Beyond all of that, this little nugget (from the brief) I truly hope the Supreme Court reads is the most asinine rationalization for the rejection of SB1070 I have ever read (other than &quot;all supporters of SB1070 MUST be racist&quot;): 

&quot;Hill &amp; Usher, L.L.C., is an Arizona insurance company that insures businesses and individuals, including many construction companies. Hill &amp; Usher joins this brief because it is worried about the burden S.B. 1070 imposes on the commercial insurance industry. For instance, proponents of S.B. 1070 argue that businesses should employ convicts to mitigate labor shortages caused by the law. Needless to say, forcing businesses to hire convicts, many of them violent felons, will greatly affect commercial insurance in Arizona.&quot;

So, in other words, this particular company would rather have the companies it insures hire illegals than american citizens (or those on work visas) who may or may not be convicted felons. Therefore when an illegal gets hurt on the job, they just drop him/her off at an emergency room and let medicare take care of the bill (re: taxpayers), not the insurance company, because the insurance company doesn&#039;t have to cover them financially. Yeah those meanie Republicans are just trying to discriminate against the poor downtrodden Latin people, who only want to come here for a better life, by helping convicts (of which a vast majority are of minority decent) get jobs. Yep, that&#039;s AWESOME reasoning to drop SB1070 and what a way to help convicts break out the cyclical pattern of imprisonment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a total of 350 businesses (the # mentioned in the brief) which totals a whopping 6% of all of the businesses (522,926) in AZ are speaking for all businesses in AZ? The AZHCC only represents a total of 116 businesses (most of which aren&#8217;t Hispanic owned), which brings the total to 466. Even if one includes the number of ALL Hispanic owned businesses @ approx. 52,000, that still doesn&#8217;t reach 15% of all businesses in AZ.  How can that possibly be a true representation of the businesses&#8217; position on SB1070, especially since there are plenty of naturalized immigrants who are business owners that DO support SB1070? </p>
<p>Beyond all of that, this little nugget (from the brief) I truly hope the Supreme Court reads is the most asinine rationalization for the rejection of SB1070 I have ever read (other than &#8220;all supporters of SB1070 MUST be racist&#8221;): </p>
<p>&#8220;Hill &amp; Usher, L.L.C., is an Arizona insurance company that insures businesses and individuals, including many construction companies. Hill &amp; Usher joins this brief because it is worried about the burden S.B. 1070 imposes on the commercial insurance industry. For instance, proponents of S.B. 1070 argue that businesses should employ convicts to mitigate labor shortages caused by the law. Needless to say, forcing businesses to hire convicts, many of them violent felons, will greatly affect commercial insurance in Arizona.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, in other words, this particular company would rather have the companies it insures hire illegals than american citizens (or those on work visas) who may or may not be convicted felons. Therefore when an illegal gets hurt on the job, they just drop him/her off at an emergency room and let medicare take care of the bill (re: taxpayers), not the insurance company, because the insurance company doesn&#8217;t have to cover them financially. Yeah those meanie Republicans are just trying to discriminate against the poor downtrodden Latin people, who only want to come here for a better life, by helping convicts (of which a vast majority are of minority decent) get jobs. Yep, that&#8217;s AWESOME reasoning to drop SB1070 and what a way to help convicts break out the cyclical pattern of imprisonment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Slater</title>
		<link>http://politicsuncuffed.com/immigration/arizona-businesses-show-courage-tell-supreme-court-to-strike-down-sb1070/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsuncuffed.com/?p=709#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>Of course Arizona businesses want the Supreme Court to strike down SB1070, they don&#039;t want to lose the cheap labor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Arizona businesses want the Supreme Court to strike down SB1070, they don&#8217;t want to lose the cheap labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
